AR

⚖️ Comparison

Compare any two phones with verified official numbers and get a clear, data-driven verdict.

120 devicesUpdated 2026-11-09Every figure sourced
1
Device 1Choose a device
VS
2
Device 2Choose a device
✨ Help me choose: answer 3 questions
Xiaomi

POCO F7

7.3/ 10
Winner
vs
Xiaomi

POCO X7 Pro

6.8/ 10

🏆 Verdict

⁦POCO F7⁩ is the better pick overall by 4.9 points, leading in Build & durability, Battery and Performance. ⁦POCO X7 Pro⁩ remains a strong contender elsewhere.

New comparison

By category

POCO F7POCO X7 Pro
82Performance74
54Camera54
89Battery78
53Charging53
77Display77
94Build & durability80
43Updates43

Performance

⁦POCO F7⁩ is faster with the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (performance index 82 vs 74). You notice it in heavy games and video editing, less in daily use.

Camera

The two camera systems are close on paper; the real difference is in processing and colour science.

Battery

⁦POCO F7⁩'s battery is 500 mAh larger (6,500 vs 6,000 mAh), about 8% more. Real battery life also depends on chip and display efficiency.

Charging

Neither phone supports wireless charging.

Display

⁦POCO F7⁩ has the larger screen (6.83" vs 6.67").

Build & durability

⁦POCO X7 Pro⁩ is 20 g lighter.

Updates

Both have about the same update window (3 years).

Specifications

POCO F7POCO X7 Pro
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
12 GBRAM8 GB / 12 GB
256 GB / 512 GBStorage256 GB / 512 GB
6.83" AMOLEDDisplay6.67" AMOLED
120 HzRefresh rate120 Hz
2772×1280 (447 ppi)Resolution2712×1220 (446 ppi)
3,200 nitsPeak brightness3,200 nits
50 MPMain camera50 MP
8 MPUltrawide8 MP
NoneTelephotoNone
20 MPFront camera20 MP
6,500 mAhBattery6,000 mAh
90 WWired charging90 W
NoneWireless chargingNone
IP68Water & dust ratingIP68
aluminiumFrameplastic
215 gWeight195 g
3 yearsOS updates (estimated)3 years
EUR 399 (≈ $431)Launch priceEUR 369 (≈ $399)
2025-06Released2025-01

Official source: POCO F7 · Official source: POCO X7 Pro

POCO F7

Pros

  • Faster chip (Snapdragon 8s Gen 4)
  • 6,500 mAh battery

Cons

  • No optical telephoto
  • No wireless charging
  • Heavier (215 g)

POCO X7 Pro

Pros

  • Light at 195 g

Cons

  • Slower chip
  • No optical telephoto
  • Smaller battery
  • No wireless charging
How is the score calculated?

Each phone gets 0–100 points in seven categories (performance, camera, battery, charging, display, build, updates), computed only from its published specs, then combined with fixed, published weights. A gap under 2.5 points counts as a tie. The performance index is an estimate based on benchmark results published at launch.

Figures come from the manufacturers’ official pages. Some specs vary by market. We do not sell devices or earn commissions.

Popular comparisons

iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Galaxy S25 UltraiPhone 17 vs Galaxy S25iPhone 17 Pro vs Pixel 10 ProGalaxy S25 Ultra vs Pixel 10 Pro XLiPhone 16 vs iPhone 17Galaxy S25 vs Galaxy S26Pixel 9a vs Galaxy A56 5GiPhone 16e vs Pixel 9aOnePlus 13 vs Galaxy S25+Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Galaxy S25 UltraGalaxy Z Fold7 vs Pixel 10 Pro FoldGalaxy Z Flip7 vs Razr 60 UltraiPhone Air vs Galaxy S25 EdgePOCO F7 Pro vs OnePlus 13R

🔎 Comparison FAQ

How accurate is the data?

Every device links to its manufacturer’s official spec page. Devices whose figures we have not fully confirmed carry a visible warning.

How is the winner decided?

Each phone scores 0–100 in seven categories from published specs only, combined with fixed, published weights. A gap under 2.5 points is a tie. The method is explained under every comparison.

Do you sell these phones?

No. This is an information tool; we earn no commissions and show no buy links.

Can I compare more than two devices?

The tool is built for head-to-head comparisons because they give a clear verdict. Open several comparisons in tabs if needed.

Why is a phone missing?

We add devices only after confirming their official specs. Coverage focuses on 2023 to date across 14 major brands.

Is it free?

Yes — unlimited, no account.