Galaxy S25+
Phone (3a)
🏆 Verdict
Galaxy S25+ is the better pick overall by 19.9 points, leading in Updates, Performance and Build & durability. The gap is large; Phone (3a) only makes sense for a lower price or one specific feature.
Phone (3a) offers more for the money ($379 vs $999 at launch).
By category
Performance
Galaxy S25+ is faster with the Snapdragon 8 Elite (performance index 96 vs 52). You notice it in heavy games and video editing, less in daily use.
Camera
Galaxy S25+ zooms further optically (3× vs 2×). Phone (3a) has the higher-resolution selfie camera (32 MP vs 12 MP).
Battery
Both batteries are about the same size (4,950 mAh).
Charging
Only Galaxy S25+ supports wireless charging.
Display
Phone (3a) has the larger screen (6.77" vs 6.7"). Phone (3a)'s screen gets brighter (3,000 vs 2,600 nits), which shows outdoors. Galaxy S25+'s screen is sharper (513 vs 388 ppi).
Build & durability
Galaxy S25+ is rated IP68 vs IP64 on the other.
Updates
Galaxy S25+ should get OS updates for longer (7 vs 3 years, per the maker's policy at launch).
Specifications
| Galaxy S25+ | Phone (3a) | |
|---|---|---|
| Snapdragon 8 Elite | Chipset | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| 12 GB | RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB |
| 256 GB / 512 GB | Storage | 128 GB / 256 GB |
| 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Display | 6.77" AMOLED |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| 3120×1440 (513 ppi) | Resolution | 2392×1080 (388 ppi) |
| 2,600 nits | Peak brightness | 3,000 nits |
| 50 MP | Main camera | 50 MP |
| 12 MP | Ultrawide | 8 MP |
| 10 MP · 3× | Telephoto | 50 MP · 2× |
| 12 MP | Front camera | 32 MP |
| 4,900 mAh | Battery | 5,000 mAh |
| 45 W | Wired charging | 50 W |
| 15 W | Wireless charging | None |
| IP68 | Water & dust rating | IP64 |
| aluminium | Frame | plastic |
| 190 g | Weight | 201 g |
| 7 years | OS updates (estimated) | 3 years |
| $999 | Launch price | $379 |
| 2025-01 | Released | 2025-03 |
Galaxy S25+
Pros
- Faster chip (Snapdragon 8 Elite)
- 3× optical zoom
- 15W wireless charging
- IP68 rated
- 7 years of updates
Cons
- Pricier ($999)
Phone (3a)
Pros
- Lower price ($379)
Cons
- Slower chip
- No wireless charging
- Only IP64 rated
- Plastic frame
How is the score calculated?
Each phone gets 0–100 points in seven categories (performance, camera, battery, charging, display, build, updates), computed only from its published specs, then combined with fixed, published weights. A gap under 2.5 points counts as a tie. The performance index is an estimate based on benchmark results published at launch.
Figures come from the manufacturers’ official pages. Some specs vary by market. We do not sell devices or earn commissions.