Galaxy A16 5G
Galaxy S24 Ultra
🏆 Verdict
Galaxy S24 Ultra is the better pick overall by 40.9 points, leading in Performance, Build & durability and Display. The gap is large; Galaxy A16 5G only makes sense for a lower price or one specific feature.
Galaxy A16 5G offers more for the money ($199 vs $1,299 at launch).
By category
Performance
Galaxy S24 Ultra is faster with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (performance index 88 vs 22). You notice it in heavy games and video editing, less in daily use. Galaxy S24 Ultra has more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB), which helps multitasking.
Camera
Galaxy S24 Ultra's main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP. More pixels help cropping and digital zoom, but final quality depends on sensor size and processing. Only Galaxy S24 Ultra has an optical 5× telephoto; the other relies on digital zoom. Galaxy A16 5G has the higher-resolution selfie camera (13 MP vs 12 MP).
Battery
Both batteries are about the same size (5,000 mAh).
Charging
Galaxy S24 Ultra charges faster over cable (45W vs 25W). Only Galaxy S24 Ultra supports wireless charging.
Display
Galaxy S24 Ultra has the larger screen (6.8" vs 6.7"). Galaxy S24 Ultra's display is smoother at 120Hz vs 90Hz. Galaxy S24 Ultra's screen gets brighter (2,600 vs 800 nits), which shows outdoors. Galaxy S24 Ultra's screen is sharper (505 vs 385 ppi).
Build & durability
Galaxy S24 Ultra is rated IP68 vs IP54 on the other. Galaxy S24 Ultra has a titanium frame. Galaxy A16 5G is 32 g lighter.
Updates
Galaxy S24 Ultra should get OS updates for longer (7 vs 4 years, per the maker's policy at launch).
Specifications
| Galaxy A16 5G | Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung Exynos 1330 | Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| 4 GB / 8 GB | RAM | 12 GB |
| 128 GB / 256 GB | Storage | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB |
| 6.7" Super AMOLED | Display | 6.8" Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| 90 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| 2340×1080 (385 ppi) | Resolution | 3120×1440 (505 ppi) |
| 800 nits | Peak brightness | 2,600 nits |
| 50 MP | Main camera | 200 MP |
| 5 MP | Ultrawide | 12 MP |
| None | Telephoto | 50 MP · 5× |
| 13 MP | Front camera | 12 MP |
| 5,000 mAh | Battery | 5,000 mAh |
| 25 W | Wired charging | 45 W |
| None | Wireless charging | 15 W |
| IP54 | Water & dust rating | IP68 |
| plastic | Frame | titanium |
| 200 g | Weight | 232 g |
| 4 years | OS updates (estimated) | 7 years |
| $199 | Launch price | $1,299 |
| 2024-10 | Released | 2024-01 |
Official source: Galaxy A16 5G · Official source: Galaxy S24 Ultra
Galaxy A16 5G
Pros
- Light at 200 g
- Lower price ($199)
Cons
- Slower chip
- No optical telephoto
- Slower charging (25W)
- No wireless charging
Galaxy S24 Ultra
Pros
- Faster chip (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- 12 GB RAM
- 5× optical zoom
- 200 MP main camera
- 45W charging
Cons
- Heavier (232 g)
- Pricier ($1,299)
How is the score calculated?
Each phone gets 0–100 points in seven categories (performance, camera, battery, charging, display, build, updates), computed only from its published specs, then combined with fixed, published weights. A gap under 2.5 points counts as a tie. The performance index is an estimate based on benchmark results published at launch.
Figures come from the manufacturers’ official pages. Some specs vary by market. We do not sell devices or earn commissions.